Statement

First off, whoa, sorry this is so late, I hope its not too late...anyway. This is the statement for my final movie.

Essentially, I started thinking about numbers and their relevance in my day-to-day life when I saw the movie Stranger Than Fiction, with Will Ferrell. Usually I'm very very anti-Ferrell, his movies just don't interest me. I liked Stranger than Fiction though, I thought it had some interesting depth to it. But in the voice overs of certain parts of the movie, a narrator details that Ferrell (playing the main character) counts brush strokes while he brushes his teeth, how many minutes it takes to tie his tie, etc etc.

I do so many things over and over a day, and some of its very mundane, in fact most of it is, but I really only feel like a person or a thing that is composed of mundane detail. Like, I feel that, on a base level, all I really am is how many times i've brushed my teeth, gotten up, skipped breakfast, etc etc, and the rest is all in the past. Then of course, some of the things i mentioned in my movie where more personal; how many heart pills I've taken, how many years I've been riding the T, things like that. But by sorted them into simply 'a number of times', I feel like I'm putting them on the same level with the mundane details, which is a metaphor for who I am: a collection of events both personal and boringly common that compose my character.

Memento

The movies "Memento" is a psychological based thriller. Produced in 2000 and directed by Christopher Nolan, the movie is based on the short story, Memento Mori written by Jonathan Nolan. The movie documents the story of Leonard Shelby, a man who, in the past, suffered a break in into his house and was assaulted, and his wife raped and killed. Leonard Shelby must now living out his life with Anterograde Amnesia; this means he can't remember anything from after his wife's death, even if it has happened only minutes ago. Leonard can make no new memories of faces, people, incidents. Because of this, he resorts to taking polaroids of people and places in order to navigate his way through life.

I think one of the most powerful aspects of this movie are the voice overs and accompanying use of black and white in the hotel room scenes. The editing of this movie is notoriously bizarre and un-chronological (to use a word I just made up just now), but the black and white scenes and so out of place, so suspended in their own time lines and own events that I get lost in them, in a good way. Guy Pearce is also so good in these scenes, he is distracted and seemingly innocent without becoming irritating. There is an element of frustration because he just can't get it due to his dissability, but I think that the backwards editing is deliberate in order to put you on the same level with Leonard; you are just as confused as he is, and because of that you sympathize with him.

Sidebar: oh my god, how evil is Carrie-Ann Moss in this movie!? She's so evil! When she says all that stuff and is like "But when I come back in here you won't remember any of it" and then he's rushing around to find a pen and gets distracted by the car door and forgets everything?????? AAAHHHHHHHHHH! IS THERE NO JUSTICE IN THIS WORLD? THIS IS WHY WE CANT HAVE NICE THINGS!!!

Fast times at Massart high

Well, due to the swift and unfortunate death of my ten year old printer this morning, my book does not quite have the universal benefits of, say, having all its peices in the same place at the same time. This is a grievous occurrence and will be remedied post haste.

I learned that kid's stories, specifically the antique ones, circa the Brother's Grimm and Lewis Caroll, are not just happy-go-lucky tales to delight and entertain. Some of the stories are quite brutal and gruesome, like at the end of Snow White when the wicked Queen is forced to put on iron slippers that have been heated in the fire and dance until she drops down dead. It might not seem like part of my original conception but I put these shocking parts of the stories into my book to show further that the line between "adult concepts" and children isn't that visible. I think its interesting that children's authors used to put things like that in their stories, and maybe as a response the people and kids reading them would respond more honestly, more wholly to these stories.

It was hard to think up ways to set up photos to illustrate the passages of the stories I had picked out, and I'm still not finished with it. I guess I wanted a more industrial feel to the whole thing, more pictures of the actual city and not just taken in my apartment. I am thinking of redoing some of the pictures.

Book project

I think the earliest form of art we are exposed to is children's books. These books are probably the first and, for some of us, last times we look at learning and reading to be in cahoots with fun. When parent's read aloud to their children its an action that brings them closer together and exposes their children to certain ideas about the world. Children's books or story/picture books are the first things to encourage imagination, and it is through mimicing the ideas and nuances of these stories that children play and relate with each other. They are central social tools but also a haven for the solitary kid, who is maybe less outgoing than the others.

What I wanted to do with this project is relate these fairy tales to the world in which we live in today. I wanted to make the reference that these stories are based on the real world, and also possibly hint that, because of them, the real world is made more magical. Thats why I tried to incorporate children's book characters into real life settings in the way that makes most sense to me, which is, essentially, graffiti. Graffiti is a very quiet art, something you wouldn't notice until it is right in front of your face, and it has to be because it's mostly illegal. It's also something that lives in the city, a place where its most likely to be unwanted and also a place where its most likely to be appreciated, which I find ironic. I think that's also how this sense of magic works, this fairy tale concept, its most unwanted in the serious, adult world but because the serious adult world is so convoluted and complicated, thats probably where it would be most appreciated.

Momma didn't raise no fool

The clip/movie I'm planning on showing today (my iMovie project) has no titles because I was unsure of what to put in them, so just to specify, I would say my movie is really all about subject-to-subject transitions. A lot of my movies turn out this way because most of the stuff I make stars me because I'm a terrible, terrible director and have absolutely no patience whatsoever. When I do use actors they end up alienated and morose, the poor little dears. But, if you want to make a cake, you've gotta break a couple of eggs, am I right? See, its this kind of gestapo mentality that has kept me from getting caught up in the sticky, unpleasant business of having to accomplish things.

So yes, the things I feel that are strong in this movie are the subject to subject transitions. I also enjoy using experimental lighting and shot compositions. Most of my scenes are close ups, because the action (and actions) that are going on are minimal, and close ups enhance the drama of the moment.

When the Levees Broke

The show in the Brant gallery at first looks pretty sparse; there are posters around the walls, some of which I liked but mostly they were a little heavily laid out for me. That is to say, I liked the more subtle ones, the kid with the eagle on his shoulders, the divide symbol with the word "racism" on it. Although there's probably a whole science in poster making that I just don't know about about conveying a basic message in a finite amount of time, so, maybe the more heavy handed ones have their place as well.

Also, in the room they have When the Levees Broke, Spike Lee's new documentary about Hurricane Katrina and what the breach in the levees did to New Orleans. They have the director commentary one as well, which is cool. I think this documentary just came out straight to Criterion, which is cool because that means it will stay as visually appealing as it was meant to be. The footage of the devastation is always harrowing to watch, but to see it this way, and not just on crappy video phone-style news footage, is shocking. The foot-high water and totaled houses and property are unlike anything I've ever seen before.

I dunno, just funny lookin

In my infinite wisdom, the movieI have chosen to research is Fargo, a murder drama that takes place in Fargo, North Dakota. It was wrtten and directed in 1996 by the Coen Brothers, Ethan and Joel, critically-acclaimed directors of Millers Crossing, Blood Simple and The Big Lebowski. "Blood Simple", the brothers' first movie which they both wrote and directed, debuted in 1984 and was met with a fair amount of critical acclaim, enabling the brothers to begin establishing a name for themselves. The Coen brothers are somewhat known for creating glacial pace in their movies, which can be seen easily in Blood Simple, Millers Crossing and Fargo, to name a few; these are films that all start off at a crawl and then pick up substantially. Fargo is no different. The plot kicks off with a car salesman, Jerry Lundegaard, who arranges to have his wife kidnapped by two thugs in order to get ransom money from his father in law. The deal goes wrong when the thugs, Carl Showalter and Gaear Grimsrud kill a police officer and two civilians on their way out of town. This is what alerts the local police, headed by Margie Gunderson (Frances McDormand) to their goings ons. Eventually, Carl shoots the senior Lundegaard and takes all the ransom money, only to be killed by his accomplice Gaear. By the time Margie catches up to them, Gaear is systematically shoving Showalter's body into a woodchipper. He is shot and, along with Jerry Lundegaared, apprehended. The movie ends with Margie returning home to her loving husband and ordinary life.

In terms of visuals, Fargo is very sincerely a Coen brothers movie. It is very visual, taking advantage of the cold North Dakota winters and showing broad expanses of frozen land. The interiors of the houses are impressive as well, always made to look homey and lived in, full of trinkets and junk. Color doesn't always play a huge part in Coen movies, and in this one the color is fairly muted due to the overbearing white of the snow. However, there are some scenes that take place in Carl and Gaear's car at night when the red light of a car's tail lights heighten the sick feeling of tension.

The thing I really love about this movie is the dialogue. Every character has a completely different and unique way of speaking, not so much in accent but in tone and word choice. You could probably tell which character was speaking in the script without names, the style is so specific to the character. Every conversation any characters have are carefully choreographed to be meaningful without being exhaustingly so; you get the sense that every moment of dialogue is important without feeling like you're having too much information forced upon you. Not everything can be about exposition without seeming too earnest, but in Fargo, moments of casual exchanges have been woven in throughout plot advancement, making the plot line fuller and easier to navigate. Plot development and tempo in Coen films typically follow a similar arc; the movies start of slowly, the scenes building in momentum until several scenes and exposition happen all at once. Fargo follows this same template, ending with another, smaller slow arc that wraps things up quietly. Miller's Crossing was like that as well, or at least I assume. I didn't make it all the way through that one, I had to take a breather from which I have yet to recover.

(Fargo, beginning of chapter 28 up until arrest of Jerry in Bismark)
The scene I presented is actually very sparse. There are four different shots and angles total, three of which are close ups of Margie and Gaear. Usually the close up stays on Margie, who is the only character with lines in this particular scene, as she talks but when she says "There's more to life than a little money, you know" the camera holds on Gaear's expressionless face, further illustrating his lack of conscience and emotion. When the shot cuts back to Margie and she says "Don't you know that?" we see a little bit of what might seem like naievety but I think is really just Margie's firm belief that people are basically good. The fact that she is a police officer and still holds this belief makes her more of a heroic character, and in the scheme of what has unfolded in this movie, the fact that Margie can remain so morally clean (in belief, not necessarily in deed-she is, after all, a pregnant cop, making her an already "clean" and "good character), is remarkable. She remains unjaded, even after seeing a man go through a woodchipper. I think this also echos the mindset of the North Dakota town that the Coen bros' were trying to exemplify--the almost amnesiac attitude that allows them to live their small lives happily. That is not to say that these lives have less merit or are less worthy of note. Its something that police have to adopt, otherwise they are controlled by their jobs and having seen too much, I believe.

Its a short scene, so most scene transitions are action-to-action or even moment-to-moment, because there's not a whole heck of a lot of action taking place. However, I feel this is the peaking moment of intensity in the movie; others might feel it is the moment when Margie discovers Gaear and the woodchipper, and that moment is definitely the culmination of the main plot action in the film. Its the scene after, however, with Margie and Gaear in the car, in which so much is revealed about both characters and the scope of his and her reactions as a whole, and I honestly can't take my eyes off the screen as Margie reprimands this brutal murderer as if he were a small child.

Absence!

(Lyssa, I can't seem to figure out your email address, so I'm posting this here in the hopes that you will see it.)

Hi Lyssa, I'm sorry I couldn't be in class today, I had a little family emergency and had to miss class. I was wondering what the homework was for next week, and if there are any hand outs I need, when would be a good time for me to pick them up?

Also, due to this same emergency, the computer I have my project on got left in Natick and the earliest I could hand my project in would be this friday. I understand that it will be marked as late, I was just hoping that maybe I could get some credit on it as I have put work in to it. I understand, however, if you decide not to accept it.

- Zoe Hyde (zchyde@yahoo.com)

Invasion of the time eaters.

"It has been established that the discovery of the camera obscura was accidental, sometime in early 11th century Egypt. A Muslim named Abu Ali Al-Hasan Ibn al-Haitham (965-1039 CE), known in the West as Al-Hazen, is accredited for its discovery while carrying out practical experiments on optics. [...] In the experiment he undertook, in order to establish that light travels in time and with speed, he says:

'If the hole was covered with a curtain and the curtain was taken off, the light traveling from the hole to the opposite wall will consume time.'"
(Wikipedia)

Response to Brant Gallery Camera Obscura:
Whoa, that was nuts. We were in the dark for a really long time, it seems. We saw the image on the paper first, which was brighter and more in focus due to its concentration, which makes sense. Its the same thing as when you have a shorter exposure time when the enlarger is closer to the paper than when it is higher up and farther away when printing. It took us longer to see the image on the back wall but it was visible eventually. The thing we, or at least I thought was the most interesting about the camera obscura was that it captured moving objects in space in real time. It does consume time, the way Al-Hazen said. It projects exactly what is happening without the use of technology or any sort of unusual delay. I thought it would be wild to be in a camera obscura that was projecting in the rain or during a rain storm, but obviously the likelihood of that happening isn't very good seeing as the light during a rain storm probably wouldn't be powerful enough to project. My group was talking about how the camera obscura is similar to a giant eye, in the sense that it gathers reflected light and projects the images upside down. Your brain conforms to the image and turns things right side up, but that is not how light normally reflects.

Brant Still Life Camera Obscura:
I had problems drawing the still life correctly, mostly because I couldn't see my paper but partly because I can't draw. The strongest parts of the reflection where the hand and the bottle, in fact those were the only objects visible at all. This could possible be due to the fact that they had the most surface area exposed directly to the light? At any rate, they were the brightest and most recognizable objects. Still, my sketch of them just looks like disfigured pancakes in space.

(image should be turned 90 degrees CCW)

Wacky Egyptians

Who were they?:
One of the earliest methods of keeping time was invented by the Egyptians.

Why did they keep time?:
The Egyptians kept time partially to track seasons, as they were agricultural and therefore concerned with seasons. However, priests and astronomers had to keep time more specifically, watching it almost to the hour, in order to perform daily rituals for important religious festivals.

Did their relationship to time reflect inherent beliefs?:
Yes, the whole development of a system of timekeeping that could be used in the dark as well as in the daytime was necessary due to their meticulous religious rituals.

What did they keep time with?:
They kept time with a water clock, an alabaster funnel-shaped pot with 11 fake holes and 1 real one at the bottom. The total of 12 holes were meant to correspond with the 12 hours of the night, a time when sundials were not useful. The water clock was filled with water and slowly escaped through the hole in the bottom. In order to see the time, one had to look in the pot and see where the nearest fake hole was in relation to the water level.

Who were the timekeepers?:
Mostly astronomers and priests.

Quod me nutrit, me destruit

Okay, response to James Turell. I really liked the concept of a house of religious or spiritual meaning having that big skylight to the outdoors. I liked what that link symbolized in terms of connection with the earth/universe/nature etcetera. I like churches a lot, but I think if I were going to go somewhere to worship or be reflective I would rather have it be somewhere more like Turell's meeting house. The skylight reminded me of a connection to God, and of a tranquility that maybe is only attainable through personal spiritual reflection like that.

On a slightly more unrelated note, I also liked how the actual show/section was structured. I thought the honesty of Turell's situation was really cool and refreshing, I though it was interesting how he admitted that this huge project that his life revolves around has sort of also destroyed other aspects of his life, aspects that as a society we probably (perhaps superficially) value more than art. I feel like conviction to anything thats as strong as that is bound to curdle fragile things like relationships around it, but again, a pull to create that is as powerful as that is something that cannot be ignored HENCE my creative and intellectual title. Probably considered less creative and intelligent now that Angelina Jolie has it tattooed somewhere on her body. Poor latin, it never saw it coming.

As for Turell's work, we didn't really see much of it in the video. I didn't really understand the MFA piece they showed, but that could be because it was hard to understand the composition of the installation on the TV screen. There were also parts of the crater that I didn't really grasp but that could easily be because I'm not very good spacially. I understood the concept, though...I think. I understood the window that lets you experience the rotation/angle of the earth. They kind of lost me on the lunar standstill, I don't really know what that means.

On an extremely unrelated note, this new blog experience thing is kind of trippy for me, I used Blogger Beta back in the day and posting an image was way more of a hassle. It involved image tags and everything.